Experts prioritize osteoarthritis non-surgical interventions from Cochrane systematic reviews for translation into “Evidence4Equity” summaries
نویسندگان
چکیده
Abstract Objective Osteoarthritis generates substantial health and socioeconomic burden, which is particularly marked in marginalized groups. It imperative that practitioners have ready access to summaries of evidence-based interventions for osteoarthritis incorporate equity considerations. Summaries systematic reviews can provide this. The present study surveyed experts prioritize a selection ofinterventions, from focused will be generated. Specifically, the prioritized developed into Cochrane Evidence4Equity (E4E) summaries. Methods Twenty-seven OA were found. From these, twenty-nine non-surgical treatments identified, based on statistically significant findings desired outcome variables or adverse events. Key these studies summarised provided 9 field osteoarthritis.. Expert participants asked rate feasibility, system effects, universality, impact inequities, priority translation E4E also encouraged make comments context each rating. Free text responses coded inductively grouped subthemes themes. Results rated intervention home land-based exercise knee highest an summaries, followed by individual OA, class hand hip OA. Upon qualitative analysis expert participants’ comments, fifteen identified three overall themes: (1) this aspect unnecessary unsafe ; (2) may increase inequities; (3) noted difficulties completing rating exercise. Conclusion list corresponding commentary generated information used direct support knowledge efforts.
منابع مشابه
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
s and other grey literature have been shown to be sources of approximately 10% of the studies referenced in Cochrane reviews (Mallett 2002). Over one-half of trials reported in conference abstract never reach full publication, and those that are eventually published in full have been shown to be systematically different than those that are never published in full (Scherer 2003). In addition, gr...
متن کاملCochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
Chapter 1: Introduction .................................................. 2 Key points .......................................................... 2 1.1 Cochrane ........................................................ 3 1.1.1 What is Cochrane? ................................................. 3 1.1.2 A brief history of Cochrane ............................................ 4 1.1.3 Cochrane orga...
متن کاملThe Cochrane Corner in the SAMJ: Summaries of Cochrane systematic reviews for evidence-informed practice.
متن کامل
Interventions for bronchiectasis: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.
BACKGROUND Bronchiectasis is a chronic respiratory disease characterised by abnormal dilatation of the bronchi, and presents typically with a chronic productive cough (or chronic wet cough in children) and recurrent infective exacerbations. It significantly impacts daily activities and quality of life, and can lead to recurrent hospitalisations, severe lung function impairment, respiratory fail...
متن کاملStatistical Multiplicity in Systematic Reviews of Anaesthesia Interventions: A Quantification and Comparison between Cochrane and Non-Cochrane Reviews
BACKGROUND Systematic reviews with meta-analyses often contain many statistical tests. This multiplicity may increase the risk of type I error. Few attempts have been made to address the problem of statistical multiplicity in systematic reviews. Before the implications are properly considered, the size of the issue deserves clarification. Because of the emphasis on bias evaluation and because o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal for Equity in Health
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['1475-9276']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01477-4